Private Credit

Stafford Private Credit invests in the semi-liquid and private credit funds with highly experienced specialist credit managers. Our private credit portfolio consists of primaries, secondaries and co-investments, primarily in North America and Europe, across the liquidity spectrum in direct lending and specialty finance opportunities.

Stafford Private Credit in a nutshell*

2017

Launch year

USD 300m

Assets under management

17

Fund investments

*Data as of December 31, 2020.

Generally, private credit by its lack of outright ownership in assets also does not necessarily attract sustainable or responsible investors. However, as the assets under management by private credit managers increased over the past few years, they started paying more attention to sustainable practices in their investment processes. We are seeing an increasing number of private credit funds with a sustainable focus and sustainable focus in traditional credit strategies where credit can take a control position, particularly in specialty finance strategies.

While building out our client’s credit portfolio, there was a strong desire to have it diversified across multiple credit strategies, which included senior secured direct lending, special situations and specialty finance strategies, and maintain our commitment as responsible investors. This appeared to represent quite a challenge especially around the areas of distressed and special situations where the fund managers have earned the moniker of ‘vulture investors’ because of their sometimes-harsh measures to achieve a positive financial outcome when assuming control of distressed assets.

Private credit managers & non-performing loans

As we surveyed the manager universe on NPL’s we found several managers that were able to generate top returns in their space through a borrower-based resolution strategy. The managers we selected have shown a track record of achieving positive relationships with borrowers and sustainable solutions by aiming to treat individuals and entities who are borrowers fairly and with the appropriate level of forbearance. The managers understand that meeting borrowers’ needs is vital to achieving positive outcomes. It is an evolving process and one which secures positive engagement over the borrowers’ account lifespans.

As we evaluated the non-performing loan (NPL) opportunity, we became convinced it was an area to generate attractive returns and could have a positive impact on society. Investors/asset managers make money on NPLs by buying these pools of loans at a substantial discount to face value and engaging special servicers to administer and recover borrower payments. This is an active and labour-intensive asset management strategy. The process of acquiring portfolios of NPLs requires an infrastructure that can source, screen, underwrite, finance, migrate, service, and ultimately monetise thousands of borrowers, loans, and assets across multiple geographies. During the acquisition phase, specialist managers have the capability to underwrite the underlying credit pools forensically in-house and can then choose to highlight or reduce exposure to specific sectors or loan characteristics, such as legal jurisdiction, property type, etc. Once purchased, the managers can interact directly with borrowers and have a choice of various workout strategies, each adding the potential to extract additional returns in these investments.

There are two principal approaches to recovering value: asset resolution or through borrower-based resolution.

  • Most managers follow an asset resolution strategy which has little regard for the borrower. Asset resolution is the least preferable option because it extends timelines to payment. Examples of asset resolution include "cash for keys", short sales, or even deed in lieu. The worst outcome would be to move to foreclose due to longer timelines.

  • Borrower-based resolution strategy, however, aims to convert an NPL into a reperforming loan through some form of loan modification which is advantageous to the original borrower. Here the borrower needs to be willing and able to make payments and, in many cases, an overall reduction in the debt outstanding and a manageable payment plan is all that is required to make the loan performing again. The borrowers usually are highly motivated to rehabilitate their delinquency given the impact on their credit scores and/or potential risk to the equity they have built up in their homes.

Non-performing loans require "special servicer" skills which is a very different activity from a normal servicer (which simply collects payments). The special servicers execute an asset management plan on each individual investment agreed with the manager. They usually charge a flat fee but also receive a percentage of the return that they generate. Most of the compensation received by the special servicer is derived from performance, so incentives are aligned.

Private credit fund managers’ ESG performance

Private credit is a relatively new asset class within alternative investments when compared to more established areas like private equity or real assets. Therefore, it is not surprising that private credit managers are less advanced in terms of ESG integration in comparison to private equity. According to our 2021 ESG survey, conducted through the new PRI online reporting tool, just about one-third of private credit fund managers are signatory to the UN PRI, incorporate ESG considerations in their investment decisions and report ESG information to their investors. All responding fund managers have an ESG policy in place and more than half of them have identified climate related metrics to monitor the exposure of their portfolio to physical risk. Public support of the TCFD recommendations and the SDGs to identify the sustainability outcomes of investments is still rather low among the private credit fund managers.

 

Highlights from 2021 ESG manager survey

33%

PRI signatory

100%

ESG policy in place

33%

Reports ESG data to investors

33%

ESG incorporated in investment decisions

33%

Publicly supported TCFD

56%

Climate metrics for physical risk identified

33%

Use SDGs to identify sustainability outcomes

9

Respondents

Source: Fund managers, PRI, Stafford; data as of December 31, 2020.

 

Fund managers’ responses to the annual ESG survey are being assessed and translated into scores which we summarize in the figure below. We are using the PRI’s 2021 assessment methodology for this purpose[1]. Managers are being assessed on multiple indicators related to their responsible investment policy, strategy, governance, stewardship, climate change and transparency. The resulting score ranges between 0% to 100%.

Overall, private credit managers exhibit substantial variation in their ISP scores. The two managers with the highest scores are investing in other asset classes as well, suggesting some positive ESG spill-over effects. Private credit specialists are behind their peers in other alternative asset classes in terms of formalizing their ESG beliefs and policies and implementing these in their investment process. The 2021 scores suggest that there is ample room for improvement in terms of implementing best ESG practices and Stafford will encourage fund managers to start adopting such practices in the future.

Private credit managers' scores for responsible investment stewardship and policy (ISP) in 2021

Source: fund managers, PRI, Stafford Capital Partners; scores as of 13/10/2021, based on December 31, 2021, data.


[1]
Details on the PRI’s 2021 assessment methodology can be found here: https://dwtyzx6upklss.cloudfront.net/Uploads/v/g/y/2021_assessmentmethodology_jan_2021_403875.pdf